Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power Plants



 

Whether you view nuclear power as the promise for a better tomorrow or a whopping down payment on a mutant-filled apocalypse, there’s a good chance you won’t be easily converted to the other side. After all, nuclear power boasts a number of advantages, as well as its share of downright depressing negatives.

As far as positives go, nuclear power’s biggest advantages are tied to the simple fact that it doesn’t depend on fossil fuel. Coal and natural gas power plants emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. With nuclear power plants, CO2 emissions are minimal.

According to the Nuclear Energy Institute, the power produced by the world’s nuclear plants would normally produce 2 billion metric tons of CO2 per year if they depended on fossil fuel. In fact, a properly functioning nuclear power plant actually releases less radioactivity into the atmosphere than a coal-fired power plant. By not depending on fossil fuels, the cost of nuclear power also isn’t affected by fluctuations in oil and gas prices.

As for negatives, nuclear fuel may not produce CO2, but it does provide its share of problems. Historically, mining and purifying uranium hasn’t been a very clean process. Even transporting nuclear fuel to and from plants poses a contamination risk. And once the fuel is spent, you can’t just throw it in the city dump. It’s still radioactive and potentially deadly.

On average, a nuclear power plant annually generates 20 metric tons of used nuclear fuel, classified as high-level radioactive waste. When you take into account every nuclear plant on the Earth, the combined total climbs to roughly 2,000 metric tons early.

All of this waste emits radiation and heat that it will eventually corrode any container and prove lethal to nearby life forms. As if this weren’t bad enough, nuclear power plants produce a great deal of low level radioactive waste in the form of radiate parts and equipment.

Eventually spent nuclear fuel will decay to safe radioactive levels, but it takes tens of thousands of years. Even low-level radioactive waste requires centuries to reach acceptable levels. Currently, the nuclear industry lets waste cool for years before mixing it with glass and storing it in massive cooled, concrete structures. In the future, much of this waste may be transported deep underground. In the meantime, however, this waste has to be maintained, monitored and guarded to prevent the materials from falling into the wrong hands. All of this services and added materials cost money- on top of the high costs required to build a plant.

Nuclear waste can pose a problem, and it’s the result of properly functioning nuclear power plants. When something goes wrong, the situation can turn catastrophic. The Chernobyl disaster is a good recent example. In 1986, The Ukrainian nuclear reactor exploded, spewing 50 tons of radioactive material into the surrounding area, contaminating millions of acres of forest. The disaster forced the evacuation of at least 30,000 people, and eventually caused thousands to die from cancer and other illnesses.

 

II. Decide whether the following statements are true or false according to the text.

1) Nuclear power depends on fossil fuels.

2) Coal and natural gas power plants contribute to climate change.

3) A coal- fired power plant discharges less radioactivity into the atmosphere than a nuclear power plant.

4) There is always a contamination risk while transporting nuclear fuel to and from plants.

5) A nuclear power plant generates high-level radioactive waste.

6) It takes tens of years for spent nuclear fuel to decay to safe radioactive levels.

7) Now the nuclear industry mixes wastes with glass and cool them for years.

 

III. Match the synonyms:

1) to pose                                     a) to discharge

2) contamination                       b) to present

3) to release                                 c) pollution

4) to decay                                  d) fatal

5) lethal                                        e) to decompose

6) to guard                                   f) to supervise

7) to monitor                               g) to throw out

8) to spew                                    h) to protect

 

IV. Combine the words. Translate them into Russian.

1) depressing                                  a) cost

2) mutant-filled                             b) forms

3) carbon                                        c) apocalypse

4) contamination                                          d) negatives

5) radioactive                                 e) area

6) life                                               f) risk

7) acceptable                                 g) level

8) surrounding                                h) waste

9) high                                             i) dioxide

10) wrong                                        j) hands

 


Дата добавления: 2021-01-21; просмотров: 246; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Поделиться с друзьями:






Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!