Questions about your Career Goals



 

>>What would you like to being doing five years from now?
>>How will you judge yourself successful? How will you achieve success?
>>What type of position are you interested in?
>>How will this job fit in your career plans?
>>What do you expect from this job?
>>Do you have a location preference?
>>Can you travel?
>>What hours can you work?
>>When could you start?

 

Questions about your Work Experience

 

>>What have you learned from your past jobs?
>>What were your biggest responsibilities?
>>What specific skills acquired or used in previous jobs relate to this position?
>>How does your previous experience relate to this position?
>>What did you like most/least about your last job?
>>Whom may we contact for references?

 

Questions about your Education

 

>>How do you think your education has prepared you for this position?
>>What were your favorite classes/activities at school?
>>Why did you choose your major?
>>Do you plan to continue your education?

 

 

VIDEO

 

 

Pair work

Imagine …

Student 1 An interviewer

Student 2 An interviewee

 

WRITING CV

 

Grammar focus

Аттрибутивные словосочетание

 

Упражнение 1.

Переведите следующие словосочетания.

 

1. Duglas Plant, Plane Plant, Plant Strike, Strike talks, Duglas Plane Plant Strike Talks

2. absorption theory,

3. energy conversion,

4. any non-metal crystals,

5. one-soft metal,

6. the mixture formation,

7. company work force,

8. nuclear weapon,

9. election campaign committee,

10. the Mississippi freedom party delegates,

11. the mail train robbery case,

12. strategic arms limitation talk,

13. the civil rights commission,

14. the European nuclear disarmament appeal, 

15. a contributor of the science policy research unit of Sussex University,

16. Europe's mass-market car makers,

17. city hall,

18. Security Council session,

19. a security crisis,

20. pollution standards,

21. weekend event,

22. suffocation death,

23. an emergency summit,

24. community pressure,

25. alcoholism and substance abuse treatment services,

26. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome,

27. around-the-edges-of-things talk,

28. a world-class orchestra,

29. requirements document,

30. opportunities study,

31. these error recovery techniques,

32. minimal order linear time invariant differential feedback control system,

33. particle velocity,

34. rock feeding system,

35. the job scheduling problem,

36. oxygen free gas,

37. the failure prone device,

38. the tactical air-to-ground systems effectiveness model,

39. production engineering functional organizational chart,

40. automobile repair plant construction project.

 

Упражнение 2.

Переведите предложения, прокомментируйте выбранный способ перевода препозитивных атрибутивных словосочетаний.

1. George Bush went to South Africa for his five day five nation visit.

2. The airport was a thirty-minute drive at the most.

3. He said it in a slow, pleased coax-me drawl.

4. It would be hard to say which was carry-on baggage and which had been checked.

5. There was a take-out Turkish restaurant in the square.

6. Mopsa was wearing her defiant, nothing-really-matters face.

7. They were condemned by an ungrateful society forever to live in pre-war council houses.

8. He was going home — some ghetto in the north or east, some white no-go place.

9. Until now there had not been so much as a mention in a newspaper or word-of-mouth news.

10. He would have refused to see a National Health patient.

11. This statement gave me a curious confidence as an out-of-work actor.

12. It was a spur-of-the-moment thing.

13. Easy to think such things; but hard to live them, in the meanwhile-still-twentieth century.

14. The banker's man-of-the-world smile reappeared.

15. It's a real end-of-the-world feeling.

16. In any case he would discuss the case in his soon-to-be-published treatise.

17. The Tehran Conference was an off-again, on-again thing until the last minute.

18. His approach had been based on a "take me or leave me" attitude.


 

UNIT 3 TECHNOLOGY

Advantages and disadvantages of technology

Work with your partner and discuss the questions

· What are the three items of technology you use most often?

· How important is technology for you?

 

Work in small groups. Do you agree with the following statements?

 

· People rely too much on technology nowadays.

· Technology can solve all the world’s problems.

· Technology often lead to social and environmental problems.

· Technology does not make people’s life better.

· The amount of technology in developed countries has a negative influence.

GMOs

What is genetically modified food?

Why do many people avoid buying it?

What is your opinion about genetically modified food?

Do you buy genetically modified products? Why?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of GMP?

 

Read the text and find answer to some of the questions.

Do you know what’s in your food? Chances it’s been genetically modified are up to 80% of processed foods in the U.S. But what does that mean, and what’s all the fuss about GMOs these days?

“Like it or not, genetically modified foods are almost impossible to avoid,” says Sheldon Krimsky, PhD, an professor of public health and community medicine at Tufts Medical School in Boston.

Unless you eat only fresh, unprocessed foods that are marked as non-GMO or certified organic, you’re probably eating food that has been genetically modified. Is that a bad thing? It depends on who you ask.

What’s a GMO?

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) may sound more like something out of Star Trek rather than anything you’d expect to find on your dinner plate. They are plants that have been changed by scientists. But they aren’t something new. They’ve been sold since 1994.

Want apples that won’t brown when you slice them? Potatoes that don’t get bruises from farm to table? The FDA has approved genetically modified versions of these foods that can do that.

People who are pro-GMO say they help farmers grow better crops faster. That means more, and cheaper, food for us.

But people on the other side of the GMO debate worry about their safety. They ask, "Do we know whether eating them over the long run can hurt people?"

How GMOs Are Made

Here’s how it works. Scientists take a plant. They change the plant by adding DNA from another plant, bacteria, or virus to it. DNA is what gives everything its special characteristics. So in this way, the original plant now has new qualities. The changes can make them more resistant to disease, bugs, or drought. It can give them other qualities too, like those that affect their taste or shelf life.

How is that different from the way we’ve improved crops for centuries? One big difference is that genetic modification speeds up the process.

Where it might take years to raise several generations of plants outside in fields to get all the right traits, inside, scientist can grow several generations in one year. Conditions are perfect in the lab. They don’t need to wait for the seasons to change.

Genetic modification has made plants with extra vitamins, minerals, and other benefits. Swiss researchers created a strain of “golden” rice with a lot of beta-carotene. This antioxidant is good for the eyes and skin. And those bruise-free potatoes are supposed to cut down on cancer-causing chemicals created when potatoes are fried.

What's another benefit of using science to build better plants, according to people who are pro-GMO? You can combine plants that could never mate in the wild. An example of this is “Roundup Ready” corn. It can survive being sprayed by the weed killer. It is made of DNA from a few different types of plants.

Because of this, farmers can treat their entire field instead of just targeting weeds. Weeds die, but the corn is OK.

Are GMO Foods Safe?

Industry and health leaders cite hundreds of studies to support the safety of GMOs. That includes 20 years of studies in animals that have eaten modified food.

But experts like Krimsky say nearly two dozen studies show bad effects, like harm to the kidneys, liver, heart, and other organs. He says they should carry more weight as people judge the pros and cons.

People who are against GMOs do not like that Roundup Ready corn is sprayed with toxic chemicals. Even though the corn can survive, they worry about how it might affect people or animals that eat it.

An agency of the World Health Organization has classified the main chemical used in Roundup as a “probable carcinogen.” That means they think it probably increases the risk of cancer.

Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, disagrees and stands by the safety of its corn and GMO foods. The company is responsible for a lot of the world’s genetically modified crops.

“They’re the most thoroughly tested food on the market,” says Dan Goldstein, MD, senior science fellow at Monsanto.


Дата добавления: 2018-02-28; просмотров: 911; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Поделиться с друзьями:






Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!