Give Russian equivalents of the following words and phrases.
An observance; to determine; the ends and means; an objective; to conduct; vulnerable; to bend; to safeguard; to retreat; to circumvent; an outbreak; a subordination; indispensable; a prerequisite; to pursue a policy; to meet the other side on the middle ground; violence; to surrender, a conduct.
Give English equivalents of the following words and phrases.
Определять; вспышка (начало); вести; отступать; подчинение; цель; уязвимый; сгибать; предпосылка; соблюдение; уступать/сдавать; проводить политику; крайне необходимый; цели и средства; делать уступки; защищать; обходить; насилие, проведение.
Read the article again. Using the article and the words from the exercises above finish the following sentences.
1. The objective of a war is...
2. The method of conducting war is ...
3. The objective of foreign policy is...
4. The methods of foreign policy are ...
5. The main purpose of diplomacy is...
6. Foreign policy must be conducted in such a way as ...
7. The subordination of the military under civilian authorities is...
Answer the following questions on the article using active words and phrases.
1. What do the ultimate objectives of the conduct of war and of the conduct of foreign policy serve?
2. What is the objective of war?
3. What is the objective of foreign policy?
4. What is the main purpose of diplomacy?
5. What is an indispensable prerequisite for the conduct of foreign affairs?
Render the article in English using active words and phrases.
7. Answer these disputable questions:
1. Do you agree that the military should not determine the ends and means of foreign policy? Why?
2. What is your attitude to the statement that to surrender the conduct of foreign affairs to military is to destroy the possibility of compromise and thus surrender the cause of peace?
3. Do you see eye to eye with the author stating that the main purpose of diplomacy is to avoid the absolutes of victories and defeats and meet the other side on the middle ground of negotiated compromise? Why? What to your mind is the main task of diplomacy?
4. Do you find it true that a foreign policy conducted by the military according to the rules of the military art can only end in war? If yes, why?
5. Why is subordination of the military under civilian authorities for the conduct of foreign policy an indispensable prerequisite?
|
|
6. Why do you think such former military leaders as de Gaulle and Eisenhower became prominent policymakers?
Make up reports on the following topics and answer the questions of the audience.
1. The armed forces are the instruments of foreign policy, not its master.
2. The armed forces should/can be a master of foreign policy along with diplomacy.
3. Diplomacy not backed by strength will always be ineffective at best and dangerous at worst.
UNIT 1. Section A.
take a significant step | |
bilateral | |
agreement | |
concession | |
to worsen | |
disagreement over | |
spokesman for | |
to forge | |
to point out | |
relationship | |
negotiation | |
to be under way | |
is expected to do smth | |
issues of mutual interest | |
to pull off | |
success | |
persuade | |
opt for | |
intense | |
Montenegrin | |
to strengthen | |
preventive | |
to take on responsibility | |
in the Balkans | |
within the federation | |
fragmentation | |
to claim hundreds of thousands of lives | |
under the arrangements | |
to come into force | |
foreign affairs | |
defense | |
economic | |
economical | |
international economic relations | |
protection of human and minority rights | |
to harmonize with smth | |
to resume arms sales | |
joint | |
to announce | |
to be under way | |
to finalize | |
a shift in attitude | |
talks on smth | |
the terms of the sale | |
to set | |
reunion of families | |
a sealed border | |
to launch a new round of talks | |
policy | |
politics | |
reconciliation | |
to be expected to confirm | |
breakthrough | |
Pyongyang | |
a freeze in contact | |
thorny | |
to put back on track | |
frank | |
cordial | |
score | |
at the end | |
elderly people | |
to split | |
immediate family | |
|
|
Section B.
to manage | |
to stand out | |
decade | |
revitalized | |
Beijing | |
to be of critical importance | |
cautious | |
delicate | |
turbulent | |
to bring relations to a crisis point | |
collision | |
to ease the tension | |
strategic competitor | |
on one side | |
incident | |
steadily | |
an ally | |
to gain cooperation | |
network | |
a long-term US military presence | |
withdrawal from | |
ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missile) | |
to mute | |
to erode | |
credibility | |
nuclear | |
deterrent | |
to speculate about | |
to account for | |
restraint | |
controversy | |
to preserve and expand the economic relationship | |
slowdown | |
recession | |
crucial | |
to jeopardize access | |
to alarm | |
rapprochement | |
rival | |
with good reason | |
response to | |
under the Bush administration | |
to take office | |
to expel | |
on charges of espionage | |
expansion of smth | |
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO | |
to fuel tensions | |
to denounce the attacks | |
substantive | |
to object to smth | |
to wage the war | |
to resist, resist the demand | |
the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) | |
to have a crucial role to play | |
reward | |
the centerpiece of smth | |
arms-control issues | |
to maintain a long-term military presence | |
deceit | |
to take unfair advantage | |
to pursue | |
the Russian people | |
hostile | |
to take advantage of one’s country | |
rivalry | |
the Cold War | |
strategic partnership | |
the People’s Republic of China (PRC) | |
joint statement | |
intervention | |
to deepen | |
the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) | |
to combat Islamic extremism | |
statement | |
communiqué | |
to contain | |
confrontational relationship | |
to prove fatal | |
to seek – sought - sought | |
friction | |
US-led West | |
vital | |
to eliminate | |
to proceed down the same violent path | |
in the decade | |
to base smth on smth | |
to be in degradation | |
in part for reasons | |
if neglected | |
ultimately | |
long-term security requirements | |
to face | |
to rise | |
to raise | |
to arouse | |
challenge | |
to maintain regional stability | |
to trigger | |
a clash over | |
determination | |
a ballistic missile defense system | |
to exceed | |
the size of nuclear forces | |
to deploy | |
to compel | |
to offset | |
thereby | |
to abandon | |
goal | |
multilateral institutions | |
to underwrite | |
anchor | |
primacy | |
to the maximum extent | |
engagement in smth | |
Rapid Reaction Force | |
out-of-area engagement | |
military capacity | |
to intercept | |
substantially | |
constitutional Gordian knot | |
compatible with smth | |
to come to its sharpest edge | |
the Japanese | |
to assume | |
to bar | |
consequence | |
to bring smth through smth | |
equilibrium | |
by means other than military force | |
to bring about | |
benign | |
adjustment | |
to be capable of | |
purpose | |
collective | |
environmental collapse | |
collective military defense | |
to chart | |
aspiration | |
societal | |
indispensable | |
commitment | |
South Korea | |
the Korean peninsula |
|
|
|
|
Section C.
the armed forces | |
foreign policy | |
observance | |
pursue a policy | |
determining | |
the ends and means | |
objective | |
the conduct of war | |
to employ means | |
mode of thought | |
to bear upon | |
unconditional | |
violence | |
vulnerable | |
armor | |
the sole question | |
defeat | |
to bend | |
to safeguard | |
relative | |
obstacle | |
retreat | |
to circumvent | |
to maneuver around smth | |
to dissolve | |
persuasion | |
pressure | |
to surrender | |
intricate | |
subtle | |
to meet the other side on the middle ground | |
outbreak | |
inevitable | |
sovereign | |
permanent | |
subordination | |
civilian authorities | |
prerequisite |
Дата добавления: 2019-01-14; просмотров: 721; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы! |
Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!