Задания по деловому английскому языку
Задания: · Выполнить контрольную работу № 5 · выполнить задания по деловому английскому языку
КОНТРОЛЬНОЕ ЗАДАНИЕ 5
Вариант 1
Для того чтобы правильно выполнить задание 5, необходимо усвоить следующие разделы курса английского языка:
1. Функции слова AS
2. Простые неличные формы глагола: Participle I (Present Participle), Participle II (Past Participle) в функциях определения и обстоятельства.
3. Простые неличные формы глагола: Gerund
4. Бессоюзное подчинение
ВАРИАНТ 1
I. Перепишите следующие предложения; подчеркните Participle I и Participle II и установите функции каждого из них, т.е. укажите, является ли оно определением, обстоятельством или частью глагола-сказуемого. Переведите предложения на русский язык
1. The atoms forming our planet are built of negative electrons, positive protons and ordinary neutrons.
2. Nylon was the first synthetic fibre used in clothing.
3. This kind of treatment when used makes the metals heat-resistant.
4. When passing through an electroscope, X-rays cause its discharge.
II. Переведите следующие предложения на русский язык
1.The instruments our plant produces help to automate production processes.
2.This means both men and women attend the same university.
3. The methods we have just described are very effective.
4. Any mineral a metal can be obtained from is called an ore.
III. Переведите предложения, обращая внимание на различные значения AS
1. As I live far from the Institute I have to take a tram.
2. Man-made satellites had to use solar cells as a source of power.
3. The gravitation force between two bodies gets smaller as the bodies get farther apart.
4. Many metals are found in pure state as well as in combination.
IV. Translate the sentences
1. Increasing pressure leads to the decrease of gas volume.
|
|
|
2. The diamond is used for cutting metals as it is the hardest of stones. 3. You may use this instrument for measuring gas pressure.
4. The task of the factory was producing corrosion-resistant polymers in far larger quantities.
5. The use of water reducing admixture is effective in increasing the strength of concrete mixtures.
V. Прочитайте и письменно переведите на русский язык
Business ethics
Business ethics reflects the philosophy of business, of which one aim is to determine the fundamental purposes of a company. If a company's purpose is to maximize shareholder returns, then sacrificing profits to other concerns is a violation of its fiduciary responsibility. Corporate entities are legally considered as persons in USA and in most nations. The 'corporate persons' are legally entitled to the rights and liabilities due to citizens as persons. Ethics are the rules or standards that govern our decisions on a daily basis. Many equate “ethics” with conscience or a simplistic sense of “right” and “wrong.” Others would say that ethics is an internal code that governs an individual’s conduct, ingrained into each person by family, faith, tradition, community, laws, and personal mores. Corporations and professional organizations, particularly licensing boards, generally will have a written “Code of Ethics” that governs standards of professional conduct expected of all in the field. It is important to note that “law” and “ethics” are not synonymous, nor are the “legal” and “ethical” courses of action in a given situation necessarily the same. Statutes and regulations passed by legislative bodies and administrative boards set forth the “law.” Slavery once was legal in the US, but one certainly wouldn’t say forcibly enslaving humans was an “ethical” act. Economist Milton Friedman writes that corporate executives' "responsibility... generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to their basic rules of the society, both those embodied in law and those embodied in ethical custom". Friedman also said, "the only entities who can have responsibilities are individuals ... A business cannot have responsibilities. So the question is, do corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, have responsibilities in their business activities other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible? And my answer to that is, no, they do not." A multi-country 2011 survey found support for this view among the "informed public" ranging from 30 to 80%. Ronald Duska views Friedman's argument as consequentialist rather thanpragmatic, implying that unrestrained corporate freedom would benefit the most in long term. Similarly author business consultant Peter Drucker observed, "There is neither a separate ethics of business nor is one needed", implying that standards of personal ethics cover all business situations. However, Peter Drucker in another instance observed that the ultimate responsibility of company directors is not to harm—primum non nocere.
|
|
|
Задания по деловому английскому языку
Дата добавления: 2018-06-27; просмотров: 326; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы! |
Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!