Each possible state of the machine corresponds uniquely to



A particular element in the graph, and vice versa. The correspon-

Dence is one-one.

Each succession of states that the machine passes through

Because of its inner dynamic nature corresponds to an unbroken

Chain of arrows through the corresponding elements.

If the machine goes to a state and remains there (a state of

Equilibrium, S.5/3) the element that corresponds to the state will

Have no arrow leaving it (or a re-entrant one, S.2/17).

If the machine passes into a regularly recurring cycle of

States, the graph will show a circuit of arrows passing through the

Corresponding elements.

The stopping of a machine by the experimenter, and its

Restarting from some new, arbitrarily selected, state corresponds,

In the graph, to a movement of the representative point from one

Element to another when the movement is due to the arbitrary

Action of the mathematician and not to an arrow.

When a real machine and a transformation are so related, the

Transformation is the canonical representation of the machine,

And the machine is said to embody the transformation.

Ex. 1: A culture medium is inoculated with a thousand bacteria, their number

Doubles in each half-hour. Write down the corresponding transformation

Ex. 2: (Continued.) Find n after the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, . . ., 6th steps.

Ex. 3: (Continued.) (i) Draw the ordinary graph, with two axes, showing the cul-

Ture’s changes in number with time. (ii) Draw the kinematic graph of the sys-

Tem’s changes of state.

Ex. 4: A culture medium contains 109 bacteria and a disinfectant that, in each

Minute, kills 20 per cent of the survivors. Express the change in the number

Of survivors as a transformation.

Ex. 5: ( Continued.) (i) Find the numbers of survivors after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 minutes.

Ii) To what limit does the number tend as time goes on indefinitely?

Ex. 6: Draw the kinematic graph of the transformation in which n' is, in a table

of four-figure logarithms, the rounded-off right-hand digit of log10 (n+70).

What would be the behaviour of a corresponding machine?

Ex. 7: (Continued, but with 70 changed to 90).

Ex. 8: (Continued, but with 70 changed to 10.) How many basins has this

Graph?

Closure. Another reason for the importance of closure can

Now be seen. The typical machine can always be allowed to go on

In time for a little longer, simply by the experimenter doing noth-

ing! This means that no particular limit exists to the power that the

Transformation can be raised to. Only the closed transformations

Allow, in general, this raising to any power. Thus the transforma-

Tion T

T: ↓

A b c d e f g

E b m f g c f

Is not closed. T4(a) is c and T5(a) is m. But T(m) is not defined, so

T6(a) is not defined. With a as initial state, this transformation

Does not define what happens after five steps. Thus the transfor-

Mation that represents a machine must be closed. The full signif-

Icance of this fact will appear in S.10/4.

The discrete machine. At this point it may be objected that

Most machines, whether man-made or natural, are smooth-work-

Ing, while the transformations that have been discussed so far

Change by discrete jumps. These discrete transformations are,

However, the best introduction to the subject. Their great advan-

Tage IS their absolute freedom from subtlety and vagueness, for

Every one of their properties is unambiguously either present or

Absent. This simplicity makes possible a security of deduction that

Is essential if further developments are to be reliable. The subject

Was touched on in S.2/1.

In any case the discrepancy is of no real importance. The discrete

Change has only to become small enough in its jump to approximate

As closely as is desired to the continuous change. It must further be

Remembered that in natural phenomena the observations are almost

Invariably made at discrete intervals; the “continuity” ascribed to

Natural events has often been put there by the observer’s imagina-

Tion, not by actual observation at each of an infinite number of

Points. Thus the real truth is that the natural system is observed at

Discrete points, and our transformation represents it at discrete

Points. There can, therefore, be no real incompatibility.

28

29

A N I N T R O D UC T I O N T O C Y B E R NE T I C S


Дата добавления: 2019-11-16; просмотров: 225; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Поделиться с друзьями:






Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!