Not have to be numerical to be well defined, is given by certain



Forms of reflex animal behaviour. Thus the male and female

Threespined stickleback form, with certain parts of their environ-

Ment, a determinate dynamic system. Tinbergen (in his Study of

Instinct) describes the system’s successive states as follows: “Each

Reaction of either male or female is released by the preceding reac-

Tion of the partner. Each arrow (in the diagram below) represents a

Causal relation that by means of dummy tests has actually been

Proved to exist. The male’s first reaction, the zigzag dance, is

Dependent on a visual stimulus from the female, in which the sign

Stimuli “swollen abdomen” and the special movements play a part.

The female reacts to the red colour of the male and to his zigzag

Dance by swimming right towards him. This movement induces

The male to turn round and to swim rapidly to the nest. This, in turn,

Entices the female to follow him, thereby stimulating the male to

Point its head into the entrance. His behaviour now releases the

Female’s next reaction: she enters the nest.... This again releases

The quivering reaction in the male which induces spawning. The

Presence of fresh eggs in the nest makes the male fertilise them.”

Tinbergen summarises the succession of states as follows:

26

   Appears

  

       Courts

  

  Follows

Female 

   Enters nest

  

  

      Spawns

  

               

               

               

               Leads

               

                MaleShows nest entrance 

               

               

Trembles

               

               

Fertilises

Zigzag dance

He thus describes a typical trajectory.

Further examples are hardly necessary, for the various branches

Of science to which cybernetics is applied will provide an abun-

Dance, and each reader should supply examples to suit his own

Speciality.

By relating machine and transformation we enter the discipline

That relates the behaviours of real physical systems to the proper-

Ties of symbolic expressions, written with pen on paper. The

Whole subject of “mathematical physics” is a part of this disci-

Pline. The methods used in this book are however somewhat

Broader in scope for mathematical physics tends to treat chiefly

Systems that are continuous and linear (S.3/7). The restriction

Makes its methods hardly applicable to biological subjects, for in

Biology the systems arc almost always non- linear, often

Non-continuous, and in many cases not even metrical, i.e. express-

Ible in number, The exercises below (S.3/4) are arranged as a

Sequence, to show the gradation from the very general methods

Used in this book to those commonly used in mathematical phys-

Ics. The exercises are also important as illustrations of the corre-

Spondences between transformations and real systems.

To summarise: Every machine or dynamic system has many

Distinguishable states. If it is a determinate machine, fixing its cir-

Cumstances and the state it is at will determine, i.e. make unique

The state it next moves to. These transitions of state correspond to

Those of a transformation on operands, each state corresponding to

A particular operand. Each state that the machine next moves to

Corresponds to that operand’s transform. The successive powers

Of the transformation correspond, in the machine, to allowing

Double, treble, etc., the unit time-interval to elapse before record-

Ing the next state. And since a determinate machine cannot go to

Two states at once, the corresponding transformation must be sin-

Gle-valued.

27

A N I N T R O D UC T I O N T O C Y B E R NE T I C S

TH E D ET ERM IN A TE MA C HI N E

Ex.: Name two states that are related as operand and transform, with

Time as the operator, taking the dynamic system from:

A) Cooking, (b) Lighting a fire; (c) The petrol engine; (d) Embryo-

Logical development; (e) Meteorology; (f) Endocrinology; (g) Econom-

Ics; (h) Animal behaviour; (i) Cosmology. (Meticulous accuracy is not

Required.)

Machine and transformation. The parallelism between

Machine and transformation is shown most obviously when we

Compare the machine’s behaviour, as state succeeds state, with the

Kinematic graph (S.2/17), as the arrows lead from element to ele-

Ment. If a particular machine and a particular graph show full cor-

Respondence it will be found that:


Дата добавления: 2019-11-16; просмотров: 227; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Поделиться с друзьями:






Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!