THE MISMATCH   BETWEEN    IMMEDIATE  AND DELAYED REWARDS



Imagine you’re    an animal   roaming the plains    of Africa—a   giraffe    or an elephant    or a   lion. On any given day,     most of your decisions have an immediate impact.  You are     always   thinking about     what to eat or where to sleep or     how to avoid a   predator. You are constantly focused  on     the present or the very near future.   You live in what     scientists call an immediate-return environment  because your     actions  instantly deliver clear    and immediate outcomes.

Now  switch   back to your human  self. In modern society,     many of the     choices  you make today will not benefit   you     immediately.  If  you do a good job at work, you’ll get a     paycheck in a   few weeks.   If  you exercise today, perhaps     you won’t be overweight next year. If  you save money now,     maybe   you’ll have enough  for retirement decades from now.     You live in what scientists call a   delayed-return environment     because you can work for years before    your actions  deliver     the intended payoff.

The   human  brain did not evolve    for life in a   delayed-return environment. The earliest  remains of modern humans,     known   as Homo sapiens sapiens, are approximately two     hundred thousand years old. These    were the first humans to     have a   brain relatively similar   to ours. In particular, the     neocortex—the newest   part of the brain and the region     responsible for higher   functions like language—was roughly     the same size two hundred thousand years ago as today.     You are walking around with the same hardware as your     Paleolithic ancestors.

It is  only recently—during the last five hundred years or so—that society   has shifted   to a   predominantly delayed-return     environment.* Compared to the age of the brain,    modern     society   is  brand-new. In the last  one hundred years,     we     have seen the rise of the car, the airplane, the   television,     the personal computer, the internet, the smartphone, and     Beyoncé. The world has changed much     in recent    years,     but human nature has changed little.

Similar to other animals on the African  savannah, our     ancestors spent their days responding to grave threats, securing     the next meal, and taking    shelter   from a   storm.   It     made sense to place a   high value on instant gratification.   The     distant   future    was less of a   concern. And after thousands of generations    in an immediate-return    environment,     our brains evolved  to prefer    quick payoffs  to long-term     ones.

Behavioral  economists refer to this tendency as time     inconsistency. That is, the way your brain evaluates rewards is     inconsistent    across time.*  You value the present  more than     the future.   Usually, this tendency  serves    us well. A     reward   that is  certain  right now is  typically worth more     than one that is  merely   possible in the future.   But occasionally,   our bias toward   instant   gratification    causes     problems.

Why  would    someone smoke   if  they know it  increases     the risk of lung cancer?   Why would    someone overeat     when they know it  increases their risk of obesity? Why would     someone have unsafe   sex if  they know it can result     in     sexually transmitted    disease? Once you understand how the     brain prioritizes rewards, the answers become clear: the consequences of bad habits    are delayed  while the rewards     are immediate. Smoking might    kill you in ten years,     but it  reduces stress and eases your nicotine cravings now.     Overeating is  harmful in the long run but appetizing in     the moment. Sex—safe or not—provides pleasure right away. Disease     and infection won’t show up for days or weeks, even years.

Every habit produces multiple outcomes across    time.     Unfortunately, these outcomes are often misaligned. With our bad     habits,   the immediate outcome usually   feels good, but the     ultimate outcome feels bad. With good habits,   it  is  the     reverse: the immediate outcome is unenjoyable, but the ultimate     outcome feels good. The French economist   Frédéric Bastiat     explained the problem clearly   when he wrote, “It almost     always   happens that when the immediate consequence   is     favorable, the later consequences are disastrous, and vice versa.     .    .    .    Often,    the sweeter the first fruit of a     habit,     the more bitter     are its later fruits.”

Put    another way, the costs of your good habits    are in     the present. The   costs of your bad habits    are in the     future.

The   brain’s   tendency to prioritize the present  moment     means   you can’t rely on good intentions. When    you make a     plan—to lose weight, write  a   book, or learn a   language—you     are actually making  plans for your future    self. And when     you envision what you want your life to be like,  it  is     easy to see the value in taking    actions  with long-term     benefits. We   all want better    lives for our future    selves.     However, when the moment   of decision arrives,  instant     gratification    usually   wins. You are no    longer    making  a     choice    for Future   You, who dreams  of being fitter or     wealthier or happier. You are choosing for Present You,     who wants to be full, pampered, and entertained.    As a     general  rule, the more immediate pleasure you get from an     action,   the more strongly you should question whether it     aligns     with your long-term goals.*

With a   fuller understanding of what causes   our brain to     repeat    some behaviors and avoid others,   let’s update   the     Cardinal Rule of Behavior Change:    What is  immediately     rewarded is  repeated. What is immediately punished is  avoided.

Our   preference for instant   gratification    reveals   an     important truth about    success: because of how we are     wired,    most people   will spend    all day    chasing  quick     hits of satisfaction.    The road less traveled is  the road of     delayed  gratification.   If  you’re    willing   to wait for     the rewards, you’ll face less competition    and often get a     bigger    payoff.   As the saying    goes, the last mile is     always   the least crowded.

This  is  precisely what research has shown.  People   who     are better    at delaying gratification    have higher   SAT scores,     lower levels of substance abuse, lower likelihood of obesity, better     responses to stress,    and superior   social skills. We’ve    all     seen this play out in our own lives. If you     delay watching     television and get your homework done, you’ll generally learn more     and get better    grades.  If  you don’t buy desserts and     chips at the store, you’ll often eat healthier food when you get home.    At some point,    success  in nearly    every field requires     you to ignore an immediate reward   in favor of a   delayed     reward.

Here’s the problem: most people   know that delaying gratification     is the wise approach. They want the benefits of good habits:   to     be healthy, productive, at peace.    But these outcomes are seldom     top-ofmind at the decisive moment. Thankfully, it’s possible to     train yourself to delay gratification—but    you need to work with     the grain of human nature, not against  it. The best way to     do this is  to add a   little bit of immediate  pleasure to     the habits    that pay off in the long-run and a little    bit     of immediate pain to ones that don’t.


Дата добавления: 2019-09-02; просмотров: 270; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Поделиться с друзьями:






Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!