What are the risks of cloning?
Reproductive cloning is expensive and highly inefficient. More than 90% of cloning attempts fail to produce viable offspring. More than 100 nuclear transfer procedures could be required to produce one living clone. In addition to low success rates, cloned animals tend to have more composed immune function and higher rates of infection, tumour growth, and other disorders.
Japanese studies have shown that cloned mice live in poor health and die early. About a third of the cloned calves born alive have died young, and many of them were abnormally large. Many cloned animals have not lived long enough to generate good data about how clones age. Appearing healthy at a young age unfortunately is not a good indicator of long-term survival. Clones have been known to die mysteriously. For example, Australia's first cloned sheep appeared healthy and energetic on the day she died, and the results from her autopsy failed to determine a cause of death.
Positive effects of cloning
If the vital organs of the human body can be cloned, it can be provided as a backup system for human beings. Cloning body parts can serve as a lifesaver. When a body organ such as a kidney or heart fails to function, there is a possibility to replace it with the cloned body organ.
Cloning in human beings can prove to be a solution to infertility. Cloning has the potential can be of assistance as an option for producing children. Cloning may make it possible to reproduce a certain trait in human beings. It will be able to produce people with certain qualities, human beings with particular desirable traits, hence making human beings a man-made being.
Cloning technologies can be very helpful for the researchers in genetics. They might be able to understand the structure or arrangement of genes and the effects of genetic components on human traits. They will be able to alter genetic components in cloned human beings, thus simplifying their analysis of genes. Cloning may also help us combat a wide range of genetic diseases.
Cloning can make it possible for us to obtain customised organisms and apply them for health benefits of society. Cloning can provide as the best means to replicate animals that can be used for research purposes. Cloning can also allow the genetic alteration of plants and animals.
Negative effects of cloning
The negative effects of human cloning contravene nature, because it is not via the natural reproductive process, which is by a man and a woman. Human cloning is creating life. It is also inhuman because a clone makes no differences as us. A clone must eat, drink and carry out any other metabolic processes in order to survive. The clone may even be better than his original host. It would be inhumane to treat them as 'special species' so if human is cloned it will make us to be a property which can be sold to anybody else. In other words, selling humans is unethical, inhumane and immoral.
|
|
|
While cloning allows man to tamper with genetics in human beings, it also makes deliberate reproduction of undesirable traits, a probability. Cloning of body organs might invite violation in society.
In cloning human organs and using them for transplant, or in cloning human beings themselves, technical and economic barriers will have to be considered. Cloned organs will be cost-effective, such as equipment/materials used to make the cloned organs.
Furthermore cloning will put human and animal rights at stake. Some people feel that reproductive cloning is unnatural and that it could potentially violate their religious beliefs.
Conclusion
Human cloning would not be good idea because the reproductive cloning is not yet a fool-proof method. It took 272 attempts before Dolly the sheep was produced. This means 272 embryos either failed to develop properly or were discarded as defective. Also in other cases there were a large percentage of the animals born showed a high degree of abnormality and died quickly or had to be euthanized. And those that have successfully cloned have showed many health problems and none have lived to a ripe old age so far. And also there is no way of predicting what the intelligence level and capabilities of a human clone would be. What would be the psychological and societal implications for it as an individual? What kind of a life or future would it have? Since we don't know, many people consider it unethical to go ahead and clone.
Against Cloning Essay
667 Words 3 Pages
Against Cloning
As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely to ignite a debate. This is because people are greatly divided on whether it's good or bad. A way to reach a conclusion is to look at cloning from ethical, risk, and religious perspectives. The reality is, cloning is unethical, very risky, and irreligious. The arguments I will make will hopefully convince you that cloning is not good for the future.
|
|
|
Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow …show more content…
My reply to that would be that it is not because curing someone is far more different that creating a new life and tampering with the way god created life. We should try to stick with God?s rules and his natural order instead of trying to make God?s rules. If we do interfere with this, we?ll interfere with natural evolution. (http://elibrary.bigchalk.com) If we interfere with natural evolution than who knows what other problems might occur? Cloning is a big step for the future, and everyone who defends cloning is too caught up with this new process of making new life, and not thinking about the consequences. Some of you don?t know that killer bees were created by scientists. These scientists were too caught up with the bees, trying to make them better. But the bees escaped and turned out to be very dangerous. Killer bees have killed more than a 1000 people. (http://www.columba.edu) This is an example of the consequences of playing god.
Cloning animals or humans would be very risky. Cloning is very unpredictable. Therefore no one can estimate exactly how risky cloning can be. We have already used a lot of animals in crazy experiments and none of them succeeded. Yes, even Dolly. Many of you think Dolly, the first animal to be cloned wasn?t really successful. Dolly became sick and was put to rest. Another point which often people overlook or try to hide is that in the making of Dolly, about 277
Дата добавления: 2022-12-03; просмотров: 76; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы! |
Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!