Attempted in systems of biological size and complexity ? What hap-



Pens, for instance, when regulation and control are attempted in the

Brain or in a human society?

Discussion of this question will occupy the remaining chapters.

Fig 12/22/1

Fied channels Ii and then acts determinately on M. The site of

connexion of the I’s is defined by Γ . Effects from each T,

Together with those of the other T’s and the V’s, exert, through M,

Complex controls over the dials G. When the play, i.e. trajectory,

Is completed, the umpire H reads the G’s and then makes corre-

Sponding payments to the T’s.

What we have here is evidently the case of several regulators,

Each trying to achieve a goal in G, working simultaneously, and

Interacting competitively within M. (The possibility of competi-

Tion between regulators has not been considered explicitly in these

Chapters till now.)

If the system is ultrastable, each T’s behaviour will be deter-

Mined by parameters, behaving as step-functions. If a particular

Player is “satisfied” by the payment from H, his parameters will

242

243

RE GU LA TI N G TH E V ER Y LA R GE SY STE M

Chapter

13

R E G U L A TIN G T H E V E R Y L A RG E

SYSTEM

Regulation and control in the very large system is of pecu-

Liar interest to the worker in any of the biological sciences, for

Most of the systems he deals with are complex and composed of

Almost uncountably many parts. The ecologist may want to regu-

Late the incidence of an infection in a biological system of great

Size and complexity, with climate, soil, host’s reactions, preda-

Tors, competitors, and many other factors playing a part. The

Economist may want to regulate against a tendency to slump in a

System in which prices, availability of labour, consumer’s

Demands, costs of raw materials, are only a few of the factors that

Play some part. The sociologist faces a similar situation. And the

Psychotherapist attempts to regulate the working of a sick brain

That is of the same order of size as his own, and of fearful com-

Plexity. These regulations are obviously very different from those

Considered in the simple mechanisms of the previous chapter. At

First sight they look so different that one may well wonder

Whether what has been said so far is not essentially inapplicable.

This, however, is not so. To repeat what was said in S.4/18,

Many of the propositions established earlier are stated in a form

That leaves the size of the system irrelevant. (Sometimes the

Number of states or the number of variables may be involved, but

In such a way that the proposition remains true whatever the

Actual number.)

Regulation in biological systems certainly raises difficult prob-

Lems — that can be admitted freely. But let us be careful, in admit-

Ting this, not to attribute the difficulty to the wrong source.

Largeness in itself is not the source; it tends to be so regarded partly

Because its obviousness makes it catch the eye and partly because

Variations in size tend to be correlated with variations in the source

Of the real difficulty. What is usually the main cause of difficulty is

The variety in the disturbances that must be regulated against.

The size of the dynamic system that embodies T tends to be corre-

244

Lated with the variety in D for several reasons. If T is made of many

Parts, and there is uncertainty about the initial state of any part, then

That variety will be allocated to D (S. 11/19); so in general, other

Things being equal, the greater the number of parts the greater the

Variety in D. Secondly, if each part is not completely isolated from

The world around, each part’s input will contribute some variety

Which will be allocated to D; so in general, the greater the number of

Parts the greater the number of components in D; and therefore, if

The components have some independence, the greater the variety in

D. (There may be other reasons as well but these will suffice.)

Thus, when the effects of size are distinguished from those that

Affect the variety in D, it will usually be found that the former is,

In itself, irrelevant, and that what matters is the latter.

It now follows that when the system T is very large and the


Дата добавления: 2019-11-16; просмотров: 212; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!

Поделиться с друзьями:






Мы поможем в написании ваших работ!